Difference between revisions of "2009.01.15 Cheers for Obama"

From iGeek
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
I love the quote that shows their impartiality:
 
I love the quote that shows their impartiality:
{{Q0| There hasn't been this much excitement in The Washington Post newsroom since Brad Pitt dropped by. | Howard Kurtz}}
+
{{Q0| There hasn't been this much excitement in The Washington Post newsroom since Brad Pitt dropped by. | Howard Kurtz| }}
 +
<br />
 +
 
  
 
{{ref}}
 
{{ref}}
 
* https://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0109/Obama_heads_to_Washington_Post_.html
 
* https://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0109/Obama_heads_to_Washington_Post_.html
**  
+
** http://web.archive.org/web/20090118230200/https://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0109/Obama_heads_to_Washington_Post_.html
 +
** http://voices.washingtonpost.com/inauguration-watch/2009/01/obama_visits_washington_post.html
 
* http://www.theamericanmirror.com/washpost-reporters-cheer-trump-russia-leak-story-just-like-obama-09-visit/
 
* http://www.theamericanmirror.com/washpost-reporters-cheer-trump-russia-leak-story-just-like-obama-09-visit/
 
{{/ref}}
 
{{/ref}}
 
[[Category:FakeNews]][[Category:WaPo]]
 
[[Category:FakeNews]][[Category:WaPo]]
 
</noinclude>
 
</noinclude>

Revision as of 14:36, 27 January 2019

WaPo staff caught cheering an Obama (President Elect) visit back in 2009. Back then, they knew that this was a highly partisan act that showed their lack of objectivity, and they still cared, so they tried to make excuses that there's no proof it was reporters (and made no effort to check the facts on that). But everyone who knows WaPo and their staff knows better. Even if they didn't do it, they thought it.


I love the quote that shows their impartiality:

❝ There hasn't been this much excitement in The Washington Post newsroom since Brad Pitt dropped by. ❞



GeekPirate.small.png

📚 References