Difference between revisions of "Carpool lanes"
From iGeek
(Created page with "These monstrosities cost California $2.5B+, to get a 20% capacity loss, which increases pollution, a decrease in carpooling, and 50%+ increased injuries (both accident frequen...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | These monstrosities cost California $2.5B+, to get a 20% capacity loss, which increases pollution, a decrease in carpooling, and 50%+ increased injuries (both accident frequency and severity). It turns out a high speed lane right next to a parking lot increases accidents and injury on entry/exit, and not allowing drivers to use the entire road only decreases traffic flow from optimum. | + | These monstrosities cost California $2.5B+, to get a 20% capacity loss, which increases pollution, a decrease in carpooling, and 50%+ increased injuries (both accident frequency and severity). It turns out a high speed lane right next to a parking lot increases accidents and injury on entry/exit, and not allowing drivers to use the entire road only decreases traffic flow from optimum. Supporting them is anti-environment, anti-economics and anti-science. |
<noinclude> | <noinclude> | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{{/ref}} | {{/ref}} | ||
| − | [[Category: Unintended_Consequences]] [[Category: Terms]] | + | [[Category: Unintended_Consequences]] [[Category: Terms]] [[Category: Anti-Science]] |
</noinclude> | </noinclude> | ||
Revision as of 20:07, 3 July 2019
These monstrosities cost California $2.5B+, to get a 20% capacity loss, which increases pollution, a decrease in carpooling, and 50%+ increased injuries (both accident frequency and severity). It turns out a high speed lane right next to a parking lot increases accidents and injury on entry/exit, and not allowing drivers to use the entire road only decreases traffic flow from optimum. Supporting them is anti-environment, anti-economics and anti-science.
|
|
