Difference between revisions of "Plastic Bag Bans"

From iGeek
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 19: Line 19:
 
{{/ref}}
 
{{/ref}}
  
[[Category:Fake_Studies]] [[Category:Anti-Science]] [[Category:California]] [[Category:Intolerance]] [[Category:Bans]]
+
[[Category:Fake_Studies]] [[Category:Anti-Science]] [[Category:California]] [[Category:Intolerance]] [[Category:Bans]] [[Category: Licensing]]
 
</noinclude>
 
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:24, 10 February 2020

Plastic Bag Bans are Anti-Science so the left loves them. Here's what we know: paper bags are worse, many people just buy their own plastic bags (which are thicker and worse), and if you replace plastic bags with cloth bags, then you increase diseases/illness (it is shown that food born illnesses went up after bag bans). It takes between 131 - 20,000 uses of cloth bags before you hit environemntal break-even on a single cloth bag (double that if you recycle them). But to reduce disease, you're supposed to wash them after every use: which means that they use more energy than plastic, and die after ≈50 washes so can never hit environmental break-even. So going to reusable bags is bad for the environment, it's bad for people (sickness), and it's bad for liberty: which is why the left loves it so. It teaches conformity over common sense.


GeekPirate.small.png

 
📚 References

Paper or plastic:

Cloth:

More Plastic:

FakeNews: