Examples of Voter Fraud

From iGeek
Jump to: navigation, search
GrandmaVote.png
There are three common classes of illegal voting:
  • Non-citizens (illegal aliens) voting
  • Proxy voting (voting for someone else, real or imagined, either with or without their permission)
    • Dead people voting is a form of posthumous proxy voting
    • Ballot stuffing is mass proxy voting, which often includes fake registrations
  • People registered in more than one state (voting in more than one state).

We have examples of all of those happening in some degree. And one aid (if not cure) is to sanitize our voting roles as laws like Motor Voter intended. Democrats are almost always on the side obstructing sanitizing our voting roles. Why is that?

2017 Fraud Charges in Philly

In the city of brotherly love, a special election held in March 2017 to fill a vacant seat in the state House of Representatives. Four Democrats (Dolores Shaw, Calvin Mattox, Thurman George, and Wallace Hill), in the 197th district (>80% minority voters and has only 5% registered Republicans), harassed non-Democrats, told them the voting machines weren't working, subject them to vulgarities when they returned and attempted to vote, and even had their votes altered by the staff. [1]

More ironically, the reason for this special election was because the prior candidate (Leslie Acosta (D)), was forced to resign for embezzlement for diverting funds to her sister in a “no-show” government job, and the replacement (Frederick Ramirez (D)), was removed by a judge after it was discovered that he had falsely claimed to live in the district.

2017 North Carolina Board of Elections Partial Audit

The North Carolina did a partial audit (not all counties) and found 508 fraudulent votes (441 felons serving, 41 were non-citizens, 24 voted twice, and 2 dead people voted). Something Democrats claims virtually never happens. (During Bush 2000, the election was swung by fewer votes than that).

In fact, 64% of illegal voters were Democrats,18% republicans. Or looked at it another way, felons were 4x more likely to vote democrat, 3x as likely to double vote, illegal aliens voted democrat 2-1.[2]

James O’Keefe

James O’Keefe ran underground stings for his project veritas site (for many years), a blogger doing what Journalists used to do. He showed that ACORN was corrupt, that NPR was beyond biased, that Abortion Clinics were farming fetus parts for profit. And of course recently asked Obama/Hillary and the DNC’s top campaign folks if they’d help him corrupt elections. They explained that not only could they help him, they’d done it before, and detailed all the ways to get around the systems in place (proven in the past). Not to mention walking in and getting ballots as various celebrities of fictional characters. [3]

Multiple cases of voter fraud (2016)

There’s a lot of hand waving by the hypocrites on the left, that claimed, “the elections are NOT rigged” when they thought they were going to win, and once they lost, screamed how the “Russians” hacked the election (despite zero evidence). Which is it? Are we secure, or not?

After voter re-counts showed Trump coming out further ahead than expected, and all the evidence of tampering showed it was in Democrats favor, they distracted with more claims of blaming the Russians for daring to leak the truth to the American people about how the Democrats tried to rig the election.

For most people (Democrats) the media drowned out a few cases that showed voter fraud like 185 illegal votes in Nevada, Detroit having more votes than ballots, etc. [4]

Wikileaks

DNC operative John Podesta is talking about how they flood caucus's with "ineligible voters". How Obama did it in 2008, but they're "reliving" it. Seems pretty open election tampering.[5]

Illegals and Felons voting in Philly (2015)

2105 Joseph Vanderhulst with the Public Interest Legal Foundation sued Philadelphia to get voting role information and quickly found 40 illegal aliens that had voted. And efforts to get 46 others, or various felons off the roles was near impossible. The city automatically registered people, or sent them materials to register, don't cross reference against convictions (49,914 inmates means a lot of potentail illegal voting), and they make little or no effort and removing voters just because they aren’t eligible or even ask to be removed. The law group that found that went on to look at Virginia, and found 1,046 non-citizens on that role (and that at least 200 ballots had been cast by them between 2005-2015).[6]

New York City’s DOI fraud test

New York City’s Department of Investigations did a fraud test in 2013. In 63 polling places they tried, in 61 of them (97% of the time), they were allowed to take the identities of dead, incarcerated or people who moved away and vote anyways. After publishing a scathing 70 page report on the incompetence of the system, they were ignored.

Suspicious Obama turnout

In 2008 and 2012 there was some highly suspicious indicators.While these aren’t proof that voter fraud swayed the election, they do show the problem. Without good auditing and the ability to manage who votes, there’s a valid concern (distrust) when you get 140% turn out, and or 100% of the vote going for Obama. And while it is possible that the population grew massively and un-reported since the last census/registration a few years before, it’s dubious. A few tried to prove that nothing untoward was going on, by half-hearted sampling to and not finding anyone that claims their vote was recorded wrong. But those low quality samples aren’t going to convince anyone. Even if they did a comprehensive review of every voter (which they didn’t do), an error rate should be higher than 0%. And it still leaves that there’s reasonable doubt in our processes that could be easily improved with voter validation steps. The more we do to sanitize the voter roles, the more trust in elections (even high turn-out ones) we should have. [7]

Pew Survey

Pew did a survey of voter rolls in 2012, the results were highly disturbing:

  • 2.75 million people are registered in two or more states — with no systems in place to cross check double voting
  • 24 million( one of every eight) voter registrations in the United States are no longer valid or are significantly inaccurate
  • 1.8 million registered voters are dead. And with democrats opposing cleanup of these roles is why there’s a lots of jokes like, “Since Grandma died, she switched parties to the Democrats and is much more politically active”. Especially in places that are Democrat controlled like Chicago, Detroit, New York City, and so on.[8]

True The Vote

In 2012 True the vote (a truth in voting advocacy special interest) did surveys, and they found lots of evidence that the election roles weren't true:

  • 348,000 dead people on the rolls in 27 states. (California: 49,000, Florida: 30,000, Texas: 28,500, Michigan: 25,000, Illinois: 24,000)
  • 46 States had convictions for voter fraud - more than the Justin Levitt study, discrediting that as comprehensive
  • The Florida New Majority Education Fund, Democratic Party of Florida and the National Council of La Raza are currently under investigation for alleged voter registration fraud.
  • By cross indexing names, they turned over 99 cases of felony cross state voter fraud to the fed.
  • Maryland uncovered cases of people registering and voting after their respective deaths
  • Federal records showed 160 counties in 19 states have over 100 percent voter registration.
  • 12 Indiana counties have more registered voters than residents.
  • The Ohio Secretary of State admitted that multiple Ohio counties have more registered voters than residents.[9]

2012 North Carolina

North Carolina elections board found 35,570 people who voted in the state in 2012, whose names and dates of birth match those of voters in other states. Republicans got excited about the proof of valid concerns. The Democrats circled that wagon and pointed out “only 765 North Carolinians who voted in 2012 had matching last four digits of their Social Security”. Why? Most states don’t provide that information. Also they argued that lots of people have the same names and birthdays. But VoterID would help build confidence that there’s no problem with either the larger and smaller numbers quoted by opposing interests. [10]

2012 South Carolina

South Carolina (2012) had gone through a similar exercise and scanning 7 years of elections found 900 dead people that voted. They handed this off to their SLED (State Law Enforcement Division), which did a statistical scan of 207 of the 900 results, and were able to find 10 questionable cases they investigated, and 5 that remained “unresolved”. But they found hundreds of clerical errors, and considered things like an unregistered wife voting for her dead husband and things like that, as not a case of voter fraud, so there’s some implications that they were more interested in proving there wasn’t a problem, than exposing if there was. Of course partisans like WaPo decided to spin this as proof that despite widespread errors, that this wasn’t proof of widespread fraud — even though concepts like VoterID would make it harder for many of these clerical errors to have happened.[11]

2010 Al Franken (D)

Al Franken (D) won a contested election against Norm Coleman (R). Norm was ahead by over 700 votes, but after a series of recounts (in a Democrat controlled state) which threw out some votes for Norm and allowed the dead, felons, or other questionable votes, Al squeaked a win by 312 votes votes. When Coleman challenged, the liberal leaning courts threw out his appeals. However, in 2 counties alone 393 felons voted, and other studies showed that ≈86% of the felon vote goes to the Democrats. Nothing to see here, move along. Of course Franken has been a staunch advocate against anything that would improve voterID.[12]

2006 United States Election Assistance Commission Report

United States Election Assistance Commission Report on Outcomes of Court Cases of Voter Fraud - This document contains hundreds of voter-fraud cases (with often many plaintiffs each), across the United States:[13]

2000 Bush-Gore Florida

This actually needs to be a separate article. But the point is that the election was won by a 537 vote margin. There are an estimated 925,000 illegal immigrants, and a ≈6% voter turnout in major Presidential elections (w/80% democrat votes). That’s 44,400 likely illegal votes for Gore in Florida alone. Tell me again how voter fraud can’t swing an election.[14]

Supremes Stopped the Recounts : The left whines incessantly about how the Supreme's stole the election. But by all recounts being used, Bush won by between 154-537 votes (no matter which official methodology was used)! This includes all the in-process recounts. Showing that 2016 is not the only time Democrats have been sore losers.

Some Democrat controlled papers ran theoretical unofficial recount simulation where if you tweaked standards of undervotes (not punching all the way through) and overvotes (allowed people to vote for 2 candidates and counted them towards both), and ignored all the illegals voting, then by those imaginary standards (never applied in an actual election), then Gore would have won by between 60-171 votes. Then they used that to imply Bush was illegitimate. They remember that as their FakeHistory to go with their FakeNews. But by every stricter and official process, Bush still would have won.

If Gore had won by their imaginary means, the appeal would have been to audit the election for illegal aliens and dead people voting — and that would have swung the vote 40K+ votes in Bush's favor. So those that claim Bush stole an election are either ignorant or just mad that the Supreme Court successfully thwarted another 1960 type stealing of the election by Democrats.

1996 Bob Dornan and Loretta “Dirty” Sanchez

Illegal aliens do vote, and they do swing elections. One example was it happened to be my district (46th District) in Santa Ana, California (circa 1997), and I watched the whole thing go down. The DNC sponsored a Latina named Loretta Sanchez to run a dirty campaign against Bob Dornan — with “vote early and vote often” appeals to the latino community, community organizers and activists showing them how to commit voter fraud. They turned out in droves and Sanchez won by 984 votes. California wouldn’t touch Bob Dornan’s complaint — but a preliminary House investigation quickly discovered that there were 748 votes that had been cast illegally, and the INS investigation had showed another 4,700 questionable registration affidavits that should be investigated. But amidst allegations of a cover-up or payoff, the House decided to drop the investigation and let Sanchez stay. And all of her later career: helping her sister get elected, running for Senate, her various scandals and questionable ethics, should be stained with the election fraud that got her into office.

Bob Dornan and Loretta Sanchez

Sanchez.jpg
The anecdote about Bob Dornan and Loretta “Dirty" Sanchez, and how illegal aliens stole an election in my district. Which is why when folks deny that it happens or that it matters, I just shake my head. I saw it first hand.

1993 Motor Voter

The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 was passed and called "motor voter” act, because the point was to make it easier to register by doing so when people were getting their ID’s at the DMV, with the following four objectives:

  1. Increase registered voters
  2. enhance participation
  3. protect election integrity
  4. ensure states sanitize their voter roles (make them accurate).

The Obama administration and Democrats refuse to do anything to encourage enforce #3 and #4 (like filing a single lawsuit), and only support increasing voter roles, not sanitizing them. When asked why, they said because 3 and 4 would interfere with 1 and 2. Missing the whole point that democracy isn’t valid unless it is trusted, and a way to enhance participation is to do your due diligence in election integrity, so people feel their vote matters and won’t be drown out by voter fraud. It’s this obstinance at integrity that gives VoterID efforts some legs.[15]

1982 Adlai Stevenson III and Republican James Thompson

Adlai Stevenson came within 5,074 votes of capturing the governorship out of 3.67 million votes. Chief Judge Frank Mc­Garr of the U.S. District Court for the Northern Dis­trict of Illinois publicly released the federal grand jury's report (one of only 3 times in history that had happened), and the evidence re­vealed substantial vote fraud in Chicago during the November 2, 1982, election and found "that similar fraudulent activities have occurred prior to 1982.” Based on FBI agent Ernest Locker investigation, he was struck how routine voter fraud was in Chicago. Locker believes the claims, that Mayor Daley threw the 1960 presidential election for John Kennedy with massive ballot stuffing in Chicago. This type of voter fraud, stated Locker, "was an accepted way of life in Chicago.” Conclusions: 3,000 votes had been cast in the names of individuals who were dead, and more than 31,000 individuals had voted twice in different locations in the city. Thousands of individuals had supposedly voted despite being incarcerated at the time of the election, and utility records showed that some individuals who voted were registered as living on vacant lots. 100,000 phony votes were counted in total, bringing the defendant within 5,000 votes of stealing the governorship. [16]

1960 John F. Kennedy vs Richard Nixon

There’s of course the 1960 election that Nixon claimed he was robbed in (and contributed to Nixon's caustic paranoia). This was because mayor Daily of Chicago is widely believed to have manufactured 8,858 voted needed that swung the election. FBI agent Ernest Locker investigations into the 1982 election fraud in Chicago, lead him to believe this was true (as most others at the time believed). Remember, the corruption doesn’t have to be valid, the concerns that it could have been swung just have to be. And even popular liberals admit that it was corrupted. So we know that there’s no confidence in our election process because of lack of voterID. [17]

More References

Questionable voter roles

Now just because the voting roles aren’t accurate, doesn’t mean they’re being abused — it just means it might be easy to do so. The anti-voterID folks argue that due to the dilegent checking of distracted octogenarians at polling places, no one untoward gets by their eagle eye. (How they’re supposed to know who to stop without ID boggles the mind, but that’s their claim). Yet, when investigations are done, both sides have a point. While only a handful of provable voter frauds are in evidence, there’s widespread evidence of slop, clerical errors, misattributed votes, and confidence that could be improved with basic VoterID.

Dead people voting

Non-citizens voting

Felons voting

General voting fraud concerns

Even Democrats scream voter fraud or the election was rigged, when they lose

Footnotes

  1. Philly Fraud:
  2. North Carolina Partial Audit:
  3. James O’Keefe:
  4. 2016 Voter Anomalies:
  5. Wikileaks:
  6. Philly (2015):
  7. Suspicious Obama turnouts:
  8. Pew Survey:
  9. True The Vote:
  10. North Carolina (2012):
  11. South Carolina (2012):
  12. Al Franken:
  13. US Election Assistance Commission Report:
  14. Bush-Gore:
  15. Motor Voter: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Voter_Registration_Act_of_1993
  16. Adlai Stevenson:
  17. JFK/Nixon:
  18. More voters: '

More

VoterID and Voter Fraud

The purpose of this aimless article isn’t to convince people of any particular solution, it is to meander through the facts, eviscerate the fallacies, and give everyone the data to come to their own conclusions about Voter fraud and VoterID. There are a lot of fallacies and noise about voter fraud and whether voterID (requiring ID at voting places would fix it). I’ll list just a few of the many examples of voter fraud, and reasons for concerns below -- yet, there's are a lot of DNC fronts (media outlets) that claim there’s virtually none. Why the discrepancy? Well the reason is that voter fraud overwhelmingly benefits the Democrats (DNC). If you were them, would you want it to stop? Denial ain't just a river in Egypt.

Voter Suppression

Voter-suppression.jpg
The knee-jerk anti-voterID response is, “but Voter Suppression”. While voter suppression is real, and infrequently happens on both sides of the aisle -- it's usually done by not having enough polling places in the right areas, not by checking ID. Yet when real voter intimidation comes up by goons in Philadelphia standing outside a polling station with clubs, the Obama admin drops it, because it benefited them. 400M poor people in India can voter with VoterID, and an ID is required to collect unemployment, foodstamps, welfare, medicare, Social Security. But it's "intimidation" to ask to see them at the polling booth.
Main article: Voter Suppression

Election 2016: shame and regrets

Tomorrow (11/09/2016) will be the day after a work party that turned into a drunken orgy. You try to shower and wash clean the fuzzy memories of what just happened, and have the fortitude and denial required to make eye contact with your coworkers the next day... but you all share each other's guilt and shame.

Dornan, Sanchez and Election Fraud

Sanchez.jpg
The anecdote about Bob Dornan and Loretta “Dirty" Sanchez, and how illegal aliens stole an election in my district. Which is why when folks deny that it happens or that it matters, I just shake my head. I saw it first hand.