Difference between revisions of "1946 Maoism"
From iGeek
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The NYT was also '''Rampant fans of Maoism''', while 10's of millions were getting mass murdered, or cultural revolutions (oppression of conservatives), the NYT was explaining how much better things were under the Chinese Communists. Even in 2017 they're tweeting out Maoist images and explaining, "Communist revolution taught Chinese women to dream big". | + | {{Img|NYTMao.jpg}}The NYT was also '''Rampant fans of Maoism''', while 10's of millions were getting mass murdered, or cultural revolutions (oppression of conservatives), the NYT was explaining how much better things were under the Chinese Communists. Even in 2017 they're tweeting out Maoist images and explaining, "Communist revolution taught Chinese women to dream big". |
<noinclude> | <noinclude> | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 22:27, 12 September 2019
 |
|---|
The NYT was also Rampant fans of Maoism, while 10's of millions were getting mass murdered, or cultural revolutions (oppression of conservatives), the NYT was explaining how much better things were under the Chinese Communists. Even in 2017 they're tweeting out Maoist images and explaining, "Communist revolution taught Chinese women to dream big".
References
- Foster Hailey, New York Times Magazine, (December 22, 1946), pp. 40-41.
- https://www.conservapedia.com/The_New_York_Times#Maosim
- https://twitter.com/nytopinion/status/912469539283177472
- https://www.dailywire.com/news/21547/nyt-op-ed-all-its-flaws-communist-revolution-ben-shapiro
- https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/25/opinion/women-china-communist-revolution.html?smid=tw-nytopinion&smtyp=cur