Difference between revisions of "2016.11.11 Oberlin v Gibson Bakery"

From iGeek
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
Three underage black Oberlin students were shoplifting wine at Gibson’s bakery, and got caught. So they assaulted, beat down, and kicked the owner. An arrest followed, and the three were able to plead guilty to misdemeanors and get probation without any fines and a short probationary period. Black racist activist students claimed since it was a white shop owner and African-American students, it must have been because of race (ignore the crimes), and protests ensued with the help of Oberlin College administrators and professors (who were glad the over-reactionary animus wasn't directed at them). This was the week of the Trump election, and all the FakeNews outlets listed this as evidence of racism running rampant since Trump's election. The Bakery was furious at the damage done to their reputation and sued for economic and reputation loss from the protests: and won an $11M in damages. Then Oberlin stupidly wrote a letter insulting the jurors decision before punitive damages were assessed, which is likely to treble the damages (arrogant idiots).  
+
Three underage black Oberlin students were shoplifting wine at Gibson’s bakery, and got caught. So they assaulted, beat down, and kicked the owner. An arrest followed, and the three were able to plead guilty to misdemeanors and get probation without any fines and a short probationary period. Black racist activist students, encouraged by activist faculty, claimed since it was a white shop owner and African-American students that it must have been racial profiling (ignore the crimes). Protests ensued with the aggitation of Oberlin College administrators and professors during the week of Trumps election. The FakeNews outlets used this as evidence of racism running rampant since Trump's election. The Bakery was furious at the damage done to their reputation and sued for economic and reputation loss from the protests, then graciously offered to withdraw it if the University just apologized and issuing a letter to students reiterating Gibsons weren't racists. The University refused and lost $11M in damages. Then the college wrote an offensive letter attacking the jury for the verdict, and cried poor despite $1B endowment, and lost an additional $22M in punitive damages (and legal fees on top). The cops confirmed that of the 40 shoplifting cases at the store (reported to law enforcement), only 6 were black patrons (not racial profiling).  
 
<noinclude>
 
<noinclude>
  
Line 8: Line 8:
 
* http://www.chroniclet.com/Local-News/2019/05/11/Oberlin-police-chief-Riot-team-was-almost-called-for-Gibson-39-s-Bakery-protest.html
 
* http://www.chroniclet.com/Local-News/2019/05/11/Oberlin-police-chief-Riot-team-was-almost-called-for-Gibson-39-s-Bakery-protest.html
 
* https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/06/the-oberlin-trial-is-a-blueprint-for-fighting-back/
 
* https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/06/the-oberlin-trial-is-a-blueprint-for-fighting-back/
 +
* https://twitter.com/ellencarmichael/status/1139256550181285892
 
====FakeNews====
 
====FakeNews====
 
* https://www.cbsnews.com/news/oberlin-ohio-gibsons-bakery-racism-dispute/
 
* https://www.cbsnews.com/news/oberlin-ohio-gibsons-bakery-racism-dispute/
Line 14: Line 15:
 
* Not only did they lose, but their insurer might reject their coverage: https://legalinsurrection.com/2019/06/exclusive-oberlin-college-insurer-likely-to-reject-coverage-for-gibson-bakery-11-million-verdict/
 
* Not only did they lose, but their insurer might reject their coverage: https://legalinsurrection.com/2019/06/exclusive-oberlin-college-insurer-likely-to-reject-coverage-for-gibson-bakery-11-million-verdict/
 
* Internet Outrage: https://legalinsurrection.com/2019/06/the-internet-reacts-to-gibsons-bakery-v-oberlin-college-verdict/
 
* Internet Outrage: https://legalinsurrection.com/2019/06/the-internet-reacts-to-gibsons-bakery-v-oberlin-college-verdict/
* Damages: https://legalinsurrection.com/2019/06/oberlin-college-mass-email-criticizing-jurors-could-influence-punitive-damages-hearing-in-gibsons-bakery-case/
+
* Damages: https://legalinsurrection.com/2019/06/the-internet-reacts-to-whopping-33-mil-punitive-damages-judgment-against-oberlin-college-in-defamation-case/
 
{{/ref}}
 
{{/ref}}
 
[[Category:Snowflakes]][[Category:FakeHate]][[Category:FakeRace]] [[Category:FakeNews]] [[Category:CBS]] [[Category:Oberlin]]
 
[[Category:Snowflakes]][[Category:FakeHate]][[Category:FakeRace]] [[Category:FakeNews]] [[Category:CBS]] [[Category:Oberlin]]
 
</noinclude>
 
</noinclude>

Revision as of 17:28, 14 June 2019

Three underage black Oberlin students were shoplifting wine at Gibson’s bakery, and got caught. So they assaulted, beat down, and kicked the owner. An arrest followed, and the three were able to plead guilty to misdemeanors and get probation without any fines and a short probationary period. Black racist activist students, encouraged by activist faculty, claimed since it was a white shop owner and African-American students that it must have been racial profiling (ignore the crimes). Protests ensued with the aggitation of Oberlin College administrators and professors during the week of Trumps election. The FakeNews outlets used this as evidence of racism running rampant since Trump's election. The Bakery was furious at the damage done to their reputation and sued for economic and reputation loss from the protests, then graciously offered to withdraw it if the University just apologized and issuing a letter to students reiterating Gibsons weren't racists. The University refused and lost $11M in damages. Then the college wrote an offensive letter attacking the jury for the verdict, and cried poor despite $1B endowment, and lost an additional $22M in punitive damages (and legal fees on top). The cops confirmed that of the 40 shoplifting cases at the store (reported to law enforcement), only 6 were black patrons (not racial profiling).


GeekPirate.small.png