Difference between revisions of "01 Temp v CO2 (100-year)"
m (Ari moved page 01 Temp v CO2 - 100 years to 01 Temp v CO2 (100-year)) |
|
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 08:04, 6 October 2019
 |
|---|
When you look at the Temperature record for the last 100 years, you discover that it warmed until about 1945, then it cooled into the 1970's (starting the Global Cooling Scare), then it warmed until about 2000, then it went flat (the Climate Pause) with a slight spike for an El Nino year. This all completely contradicts the IPCC Climate Models, which expected a spike up (not down) starting in the 1950's when man first put out 1Gt (Gigaton) of CO2, and it went down instead. And the models predicted smooth and accelerating growth, and in 2000 it paused, breaking the models. So in the short term, CO2 and Climate do not map at all.
There's a lot of nuances in all this.
To Scientists, when the data and the model/theory disagree, you fix your model/theory.
To Politicians at the IPCC, when the data and the model/theory disagree, you make excuses. Their was that there was some soot/particulates in the air from WWII industrialization that neutralized the warming. Which is crap, because they've never shown how much or how smooth clearance/dissipation rates would lead to a sudden reversal of temp trends. And if it was true, it would neutralize their arguments for stopping CO2, since we could control our temp by just polluting a little more (putting out soot). But that kind of bullshit is good enough for those that truly want to believe.
