Difference between revisions of "2016.06 Anthony Scaramucci"
From iGeek
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
CNN published a story (based on one anonymous source), claiming Anthony Scaramucci was being investigated by the Senate into the Russian Direct Investment Fund. They had to retract it, and admit it wasn't up to their editorial standards, and three reporters had to resign. It's like Journalism, without the standards. | CNN published a story (based on one anonymous source), claiming Anthony Scaramucci was being investigated by the Senate into the Russian Direct Investment Fund. They had to retract it, and admit it wasn't up to their editorial standards, and three reporters had to resign. It's like Journalism, without the standards. | ||
<noinclude> | <noinclude> | ||
− | + | {{ref|FakeNews|CNN|Russia}} | |
* https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/tom-blumer/2017/06/26/cnn-deletes-russia-trump-story-tries-not-leave-tracks-injects-adult | * https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/tom-blumer/2017/06/26/cnn-deletes-russia-trump-story-tries-not-leave-tracks-injects-adult | ||
* https://dailycaller.com/2017/06/24/cnn-retracts-story-about-trump-adviser-being-under-investigation-for-russia-ties/ | * https://dailycaller.com/2017/06/24/cnn-retracts-story-about-trump-adviser-being-under-investigation-for-russia-ties/ | ||
* https://dailycaller.com/2017/06/26/three-cnn-employees-resign-over-botched-trump-russia-story/ | * https://dailycaller.com/2017/06/26/three-cnn-employees-resign-over-botched-trump-russia-story/ | ||
+ | * https://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2017/06/26/cnn-resign-russia-scaramucci-239975 | ||
+ | {{/ref}} | ||
---- | ---- | ||
− | |||
[[Category:FakeNews]][[Category:CNN]][[Category:Trump]][[Category:Russia]] | [[Category:FakeNews]][[Category:CNN]][[Category:Trump]][[Category:Russia]] | ||
</noinclude> | </noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 12:57, 10 September 2019
CNN published a story (based on one anonymous source), claiming Anthony Scaramucci was being investigated by the Senate into the Russian Direct Investment Fund. They had to retract it, and admit it wasn't up to their editorial standards, and three reporters had to resign. It's like Journalism, without the standards.