Difference between revisions of "2020 Big Tech Censorship"

From iGeek
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Big Tech (Google, Facebook, Twitter, GoFundMe, etc) were all caught censoring people and posts and searches that favored Trump or told the truth about Biden. Some of that censorship might have had merit, but if there was any double-standards or in error (and a lot was), then it is an illegal campaign contribution. That's election tampering. Proof is that is that 4.6% of Biden’s total votes admit that had they known these facts around Hunter scandal they would not have voted for Biden, which is more than enough to have swung both the popular vote and the election. <noinclude><ref>Proof:  
+
Big Tech (Google, Facebook, Twitter, GoFundMe, etc) were all caught censoring people and posts and searches that favored Trump or told the truth about Biden. Some of that censorship might have had merit, but if there was any double-standards or in error (and a lot was), then it is an illegal campaign contribution. That's election tampering. Proof is that is that 4.6% of Biden’s total votes admit that had they known the facts around Hunter scandal they would not have voted for Biden, which is more than enough to have swung both the popular vote and the election. <noinclude><ref>Proof:  
 
* https://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/nb-staff/2020/11/09/fact-big-media-and-big-tech-stole-2020-election
 
* https://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/nb-staff/2020/11/09/fact-big-media-and-big-tech-stole-2020-election
 
* https://mclaughlinonline.com/2020/11/05/ma-2020-national-post-election-poll/</ref></noinclude> Democrats win when ignorant people vote.  
 
* https://mclaughlinonline.com/2020/11/05/ma-2020-national-post-election-poll/</ref></noinclude> Democrats win when ignorant people vote.  

Latest revision as of 16:12, 21 November 2020

Big Tech (Google, Facebook, Twitter, GoFundMe, etc) were all caught censoring people and posts and searches that favored Trump or told the truth about Biden. Some of that censorship might have had merit, but if there was any double-standards or in error (and a lot was), then it is an illegal campaign contribution. That's election tampering. Proof is that is that 4.6% of Biden’s total votes admit that had they known the facts around Hunter scandal they would not have voted for Biden, which is more than enough to have swung both the popular vote and the election. [1] Democrats win when ignorant people vote.



GeekPirate.small.png

📚 References

2020 Voter Fraud
This is a list of some of the questionable things going on with the 2020 Election vote. Some of these may get proven as just suspicious later, many may never be proven, but all are sketchy outliers that offer reasonable people a reason for concern. Evidence includes: ArizonaBenford's Law and MathCaliforniaCampaign Crowd SizeDead votesDemocrat ReactionDominionElection Fraud WitnessesGeorgiaHammer and ScorecardLate night vote spikesLawsuitsMichiganMinnesotaNevadaNorth CarolinaOutcomesPennsylvaniaPoll Observers blockedPolls disasterously wrongVindicationVirginiaVote RatiosWisconsin • It's not about this election, it's about all of them. If Democrats can get away with this, and suppress a reasonable investigation, then they will do it again. That will disenfranchise 70M+ voters who are getting cheated, or believe they are getting cheated, and that will tear the republic apart.