In a righteous election with some shaky events, the winner would *DEMAND* investigations and proof of vindication (to avoid any cloud of suspicion). Those trying to obstruct it, would be doing so because they don't believe in either vote integrity, or they believe/know the truth will work against them. Democrats not only obstructed any quality controls in advance of the election (and fought to put questionable process in place, against warnings), but are obstructing any auditing/investigations or independent verification to prove the vote righteous after-the-fact. That's called a red flag. Why would you increase suspicion on an election, and fight against getting that cleared, if there wasn't abuse?
Joe Gloria (D), County Registrar of Voters for Clark County Nevada, which swung Nevada for Biden, admits there were reports of voter fraud, but won't investigate any of them until the vote count is complete.  Why do you want to come up with inflated numbers, only to be forced to admit later that it was corrupted, unless you are hoping that the wave of numbers will advance your candidates cause enough that the other side will concede before the facts come out?