Difference between revisions of "Bray and Von Starch"
From iGeek
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
{{Template:Climate}} | {{Template:Climate}} | ||
| − | [[Category:Climate]][[Category:Consensus]][[Category:Skeptics]][[Category:NoIndex]] | + | [[Category:Climate]][[Category:Consensus]][[Category:Skeptics]][[Category:NoIndex]][[Category:Study]] |
</noinclude> | </noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:44, 2 February 2019
These two studies in 2003 and 1996 mapped how many (and how strongly) scientists agreed/disagreed with the Global Warming consensus, and it was a nice even bell curve, completely showing there was a spectrum of views, and refuting the idea that there was a blanket consensus.
Bray and Von Starch in 2003 and 1996
This actually mapped a nice curve of how many disagreed or agreed with Global Warming consensus (on a 1-7 scale) and got a nice bell curve distribution, weighted in the middle, based on severity of agreement: which refuted a strong consensus (people were all over the board), but it was becoming too political, so they stopped doing their poll.
|
Climate : 2008 ABC Predicted that NYC would be underwater by 2015 • 2009 Glaciers gone by 2020 • Climate Models • Climate Religion • Electric Cars • Ocean Warming • Paris Climate Accord • |
