Difference between revisions of "Double Transexual"

From iGeek
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
, I like to point out that they are just transphobic because:  
+
When people attack me for things I can't help, like male, white, knowing more than they do ("mansplaining"), I like to point out that means they're transphobic bigots, because:  
 
 
 
{{Q0|I’m a pre-op double transsexual lesbian trapped in a mans body, and don’t you dare reduce my truth down to your bigoted heteronormative cis-gendered archetype.|Me|Pointing out attackers are transphobic for attacking me as a white, male, or mansplaining, because I'm really higher on the victim totem pole than they are}}  
 
{{Q0|I’m a pre-op double transsexual lesbian trapped in a mans body, and don’t you dare reduce my truth down to your bigoted heteronormative cis-gendered archetype.|Me|Pointing out attackers are transphobic for attacking me as a white, male, or mansplaining, because I'm really higher on the victim totem pole than they are}}  
  
 
They are often flummoxed. They can't refute my truth -- as their grievance studies taught them that feelings is more important that reality. If they argue, they're a bigot. And my truth trumps their minority status in the wokeness hierarchy of victimhood. So they either deny my truth and prove they're a bigot, or they accept my truth and prove that they were wrong in making a bigoted assumption about me based on heteronormative cis-gendered archetypes, or they admit that the whole wokeness hierarchy is a bullshit trap meant to tie the other side in knots and reduce communication (win arguments). Either way, point made.
 
They are often flummoxed. They can't refute my truth -- as their grievance studies taught them that feelings is more important that reality. If they argue, they're a bigot. And my truth trumps their minority status in the wokeness hierarchy of victimhood. So they either deny my truth and prove they're a bigot, or they accept my truth and prove that they were wrong in making a bigoted assumption about me based on heteronormative cis-gendered archetypes, or they admit that the whole wokeness hierarchy is a bullshit trap meant to tie the other side in knots and reduce communication (win arguments). Either way, point made.
 +
<noinclude>
 +
 +
{{NOTE|A double transsexual would mean that you're a man that wishes you were man, and a lesbian trapped in a man's body means that you like women. Of course to the rational, that's called a normy (normal). But if I don't identify as a normal, that's just as valid as not identifying as cis-gendered. They can't refute my queer status, without refuting all queer status as nothing but the feelings/psychoses of the person. And since there's very few people that are pre-op double transsexual lesbians trapped in a mans body, that put's me really high in the victimhood hierarchy. By their rules, I win.
 +
}}
 +
</noinclude>

Revision as of 20:11, 22 August 2020

When people attack me for things I can't help, like male, white, knowing more than they do ("mansplaining"), I like to point out that means they're transphobic bigots, because:

❝ I’m a pre-op double transsexual lesbian trapped in a mans body, and don’t you dare reduce my truth down to your bigoted heteronormative cis-gendered archetype. ❞

They are often flummoxed. They can't refute my truth -- as their grievance studies taught them that feelings is more important that reality. If they argue, they're a bigot. And my truth trumps their minority status in the wokeness hierarchy of victimhood. So they either deny my truth and prove they're a bigot, or they accept my truth and prove that they were wrong in making a bigoted assumption about me based on heteronormative cis-gendered archetypes, or they admit that the whole wokeness hierarchy is a bullshit trap meant to tie the other side in knots and reduce communication (win arguments). Either way, point made.


🗒️ NOTE:
A double transsexual would mean that you're a man that wishes you were man, and a lesbian trapped in a man's body means that you like women. Of course to the rational, that's called a normy (normal). But if I don't identify as a normal, that's just as valid as not identifying as cis-gendered. They can't refute my queer status, without refuting all queer status as nothing but the feelings/psychoses of the person. And since there's very few people that are pre-op double transsexual lesbians trapped in a mans body, that put's me really high in the victimhood hierarchy. By their rules, I win.