Greg Coppola

From iGeek
Revision as of 17:29, 25 July 2019 by Ari (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Greg Coppola was interviewered by James O’Keefe in a Project Veritas video admitting that he believes that Google News and Google’s search engine algorithms were biased (and thus the testimony to congress by Sundar) was untrue. Algorithms are written to the bias of the authors and based on Greg's domain knowledge with a Ph.D. and 5 years at Google, that he doesn't believe it's been scrubbed from bias. Which is a duh! 5 minutes searching can demonstrate political bias. And his point is that he doesn't think we should tolerate Big Tech taking political positions.

In no company is it a good idea to publicly disagree with the Company, its policies, or the CEO. But Sundar was completely misleading when he made the false statements that there's no bias or political agenda at Google. And if there is such a thing, then there's virtually no way that didn't creep into their engines, especially with folks that were rooting it on. And it's obvious that if you promote CNN over FoxNews, which Google obviously does, then they're promoting CNN's agenda (left/Democrat), over FoxNews's (right/Republican) agenda.

So the question here is would Google be non-partisan / neutral (unbiased) by allowing their employees to disagree with their denied political agenda... or would they fire him and prove him right. It appears they're doing the latter.


Another day, another Googlewhack. Technically, A Googlewhack was a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words that returns only one result. (Finding uniqueness). More and more the term is applicable to finding conservatives in their organization... and then firing them for their uniqueness. Conservative/Republican seem to be getting purged from Google's employment roles for disagreeing with the corporate consensus. Of course the gross majority of conservatives never get fired... as long as they know their place and to never openly admit their views. So while far lefties and extremists can voice their views openly, conservatives are subjugated to social apartheid. As long as they're quiet and oppressed about their beliefs, they will be fine. They might not get promoted due to Google's promotion by herd voting policies, but that's another issue. The point is that if a conservative voices views, they can (and will) be taken out by the flock of angry hate-chickens. The body count is adding up. There's: James Damore, Kay Coles James, Kevin Cernekee, Mike Wacker, just to name a few that we know of and not counting likely hundreds of persecuted individuals that we don't know about. If you can't see that pattern, then I hear Google is hiring self-deluded, intolerant lefties. more...


📚 References