Jacob Blake

From iGeek
Revision as of 18:46, 29 August 2020 by Ari (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Jacob Blake.jpg
Jacob Blake

Media meme: an innocent black guy was breaking up a fight between two women (over a scratch on their car), and was shot in the back, 7 times, in front of his kids, for no good reason. A doctored video proved it. See: cops will murder a black man for no reason.

Truth: a repeat felon with a long rap sheet is wanted for felony sexual assault and gun crimes. He shows up at girlfriends house and finger rapes her again, and the police showed up because of his outstanding warrants and history. The cops try to arrest him and he fights with them, gets one in a headlock, is tased (twice), is storming to his car either with a knife or to get a knife (against the officers orders), and when he enters the car (SUV), he is shot until he stops struggling.

Occam's razor - what seems more likely?
  1. believe that cops shoot guys for no reason because they're black, in the middle of the day.
  2. believe that a violent repeat felon was shot for doing bad thing, and the alternative of letting his drive away, endangering the public and the kids in his car, was never an option. And shooting was the only option after subduing him and tasering him both failed, and he was escalating by going for a weapon (knife) inside a worse weapon (an SUV).


🗒️ NOTE:
I had one idiot arguing with me that 7 shots was excessive, and he should have shot him in the arm or leg once.
  1. You don't pull a gun, or fire it, unless it's a life or death situation.
  2. If you shoot in the arm or leg intentionally, it is both ineffective at stopping the guy (who was going for a knife) from killing you, and it proves you shot him without needing to.
  3. You can't hit an arm or a leg easily in a combat situation -- drugged out violent assholes can take a shot like that, and not stop (if they're raging).
  4. And the reason you shoot 7 times, is the first 6 didn't stop him. If the first 6 didn't stop him hitting him in the body -- it shows that shooting him in the arm/leg wouldn't have worked either.


Conclusion

Really, it's sort of one or the other. Either you deny all the facts in the case, or you accept that the race baiters, Democrats and their media, exploited the communities ignorance and willingness to overreact before the facts, all to get clicks, views or votes -- and they are the enemy of law an order, as are the rioters. If a thuggy white, latino or asian was killed for doing the same thing, with the same rap sheet, the only difference is those communities wouldn't have blamed it on race and burned down their own neighborhoods in protest. So it demonstrates racism... of the rioters, BLM, the DNC and the black community.

GeekPirate.small.png

📚 References

Fake victims
BLM
BLM.png
BLM.png
I refer to Black Lives Matter as the Black-Clan. Why? Because they're mask-wearing racist who have been more violent than the clan has been since the 1920’s. The "victims" are usually repeat felons with long rap sheets, getting shot by minority officers, for brandishing weapons. All to further a cause that's complete anti-American bullshit: that the white establishment shoots unarmed black men for no reason, despite evidence to the contrary. They're a waste of space that only lowers humanity and tolerance.